CSE 461: Introduction to Computer-Communication Networks, Autumn 2006
  CSE Home   About Us   Search   Contact Info 
 
Course Home
 Home
Administation
 Overview
 Using course email
 Email archive
 Anonymous feedback
 View feedback
 
Most Everything
 Schedule
 
Information
 UW/ACM Tutorials
    Homework 2
Out: Friday October 5
Due: Wednesday October 11 at the start of class

  1. Questions from Chapter 2 of the text:
    13, 16, 21a (skip 21b), 26, 31, 49
  2. Read the third of the primary references from the Further Reading section of Chapter 1:
    Clark, D. The design philosophy of the DARPA Internet protocols. Proc. SIGCOMM '88 Symposium, 106-114, August 1988.
    Available online here. (Choose, for example, the PDF link in the upper right.)
    You can skip Section 10 if you like -- it's about TCP, and we haven't yet addressed it in enough detail to expect that section to be easily understood.

    In a writeup of no more than two pages, address these questions.

    1. Consider this quote (last full paragraph of page 7):
      As a rough rule of thumb for networks incorporated into the architecture, a loss of one packet in a hundred is quite reasonable, but a loss of one packet in ten suggests that reliability enhancements be added to the network if that type of service is required.
      and what you know about Ethernet. What do the two have to do with each other? What modification to the design of Ethernet does it suggest considering?

    2. This paper is a companion (and predecesssor) to the end-to-end paper. It says (in the Introduction): ":For example, the idea of the datagram, or connectionless service, ... has come to be the defining characteristic of architecture into the IP and TCP layers." By datagram it means that packets are treated individually, and the network needn't try to consider possible relationships to other packets (e.g., those between a single sender and receiver, often called a flow).

      As best you can, state briefly how the prioritized goals for the Internet listed in the paper motivate this approach.

    3. What, if anything, does this paper imply about whether sliding window should or shouldn't be used between pairs of routers inside the network?

Computer Science & Engineering
University of Washington
Box 352350
Seattle, WA  98195-2350
(206) 543-1695 voice, (206) 543-2969 FAX
[comments to zahorjan at cs.washington.edu]