CSE477 is linked with TC333

CSE477 is linked with a special section of ENGR333D (Advanced Technical Writing and Oral Presentations) taught by the Department of Technical Communications.

Goal and Objectives

The link between CSE477 and TC333 arose because technical writing is crucial to good engineering. Computer engineering majors are required to take TC333, and those who take CSE477 must write substantial technical reports. The synergy between the two classes caused us to link them.

What you will do if you are enrolled in both CSE477 and TC333:

What you will do if you are enrolled in CSE477, but took TC333 previously (or haven't yet taken TC333):

Logistics

TC333D meets WF from 10:30--12:20 in LOW 217. The instructor is Emma Rose. She has graciously adjusted the TC333 assignments and due dates to better match CSE477's requirements and schedule.

Because TC333 will substitute several TC assignments with CSE 477 assignments, you must label each section of your design reviews with the name of the person who wrote that section. Even if you are not taking TC333, you still must label each section with the author's name, so the CSE477 instructor can evaluate each and every student individually (based, in part, on his/her writing).

All turn-in for this class will  be electronic. We will assign a web page for each project team, where you will post your design packages, reviewer comments, final report, brochure, etc. For those of you who are taking CSE477 concurrently with TC333, Emma has asked that you post your design reviews and final project in Word format, so she can edit your writeups easily. You must post your writeups by the due dates posted on the class schedule, so that Emma has time to suggest changes and you have time to implement the changes.


Style

Unless instructed otherwise by Emma, you should write your CSE477 assignments using active voice. We want to know who did the work, what the work entailed, and what the outcome was. Sentences like "Emma used the logic analyzer to validate the 8051 interrupt handling" are clear and concise. Sentences like "This was done by using the logic analyzer to validate the 8051 interrupt handling" don't tell us who did the work, nor clearly describe what the person did. If you want full credit, write using active voice.


Comments to: cse477-webmaster@cs.washington.edu