Ethnographic Field Exercise
Observing the Introductory Programming
Laboratory (IPL)
Mary Gates Hall Room 310
Tammy VanDeGrift
Lab #2
Introduction
I decided to observe the Introductory Programming Laboratory for a variety
of reasons. For the previous two quarters, I was a teaching assistant
for CSE 142 -- Introduction to C Programming. The students enrolled
in CSE 142 and CSE 143 use the IPL as their main computing laboratory away
from home. I was interested in the interactions between students,
consultants, and the lab monitor. Lab consultants are trained to
tutor CSE 142 or CSE 143 while the lab monitor is present for security
purposes and general computing support. I also wanted to see to what
extent students collaborate and help each other with homework assignments.
Background of Observation
Since homework 0 part A was due Friday, March 30 at 3:30 pm and homework
0 part B was due Sunday, April 1, I decided to do my observation during
the afternoon on Friday, March 30. I sat by a computer pretending
to be working on the CSE 142 assignment as I watched others working.
I positioned myself near the door so that I could monitor the number of
people entering and exiting the computer lab. The floor plan of the
lab is shown below. I observed the IPL from 1:00 pm to 1:40 pm and
kept notes of the behaviors, interactions, conversations, and movement
of people during this time. I did not move from my seat, so the students
sitting close to me were easier to observe.
Movement
When I first arrived to the IPL, 20 students (not including myself) were
present in the lab. At the conclusion of my visit, 17 people remained
in the lab. The following chart summarizes the entrances and exits
during the time I spent there. According to the notes on the whiteboard,
a CSE 143 consultant was on duty. A lab monitor also sat by the door
between 1:00 and 1:25 pm.
Time
Number of people entering
Number of people leaving
1:00 - 1:05 pm
0
1
1:06 - 1:10 pm
0
0
1:11 - 1:15 pm
2
5
1:16 - 1:20 pm
2
6
1:21 - 1:25 pm
4
4
1:26 - 1:30 pm
6
2
1:31 - 1:35 pm
0
0
1:36 - 1:40 pm
1
0
Observations
Below are my rough notes of what I observed during the study.
Students sat at computers where in most cases, empty seats separated them.
Many students had their belongings (coats, backpacks) on empty chairs beside
them.
Overall, the IPL is a quiet place with students reading information on
their monitors.
I observed several activities (based on the information on the screens).
These include checking e-mail, looking at the CSE 142 and CSE 143 web sites,
working on homework, checking class schedule through MyUW.
The whiteboard contained the notes.
I noticed the cse143 consultant talking with a student. The consultant
was standing while the student was sitting at the monitor. Their
voices were low and they were standing across the room, so I could not
hear their conversation.
A person approached the lab monitor to inquire about the location of the
printer. The lab monitor answered his question by telling him to
print to the general purpose lab downstairs and that the printing would
cost 8 cents per page.
The cse143 consultant helps a different student. This time the consultant
sits in the empty chair next to the student.
Another person asked the lab monitor about printing.
Students sitting near me were working on their cse142 or cse143 homework
and they only focused on the screen in front of them (I think I looked
a bit odd looking around the room all the time).
Another student arrived and sat two computers from me. She logged
on, checked her e-mail, and then looked at the cse142 homepage.
The consultant helps another student with the process of a function call.
I also noticed that students who wanted the consultant's help would put
their machine number on the whiteboard. When signing up on the list,
students had to bend over the desks, computers, and chairs to use the whiteboard.
Some students had sheets of paper next to their keyboards.
The popular seats in the lab were those next to a wall. Very few
students sat at the computers at the desk furthest from the door.
A student arrived, looked around, and sat next to another female student.
These two students conversed, but I could not make out any parts of their
conversation except for the words "computer science".
Three men entered together and sat down at three computers situated in
a row. These students talked to each other occasionally during their
stay in the lab.
One woman got out of her chair to get the attention of the consultant.
What I learned
Students tend to sit away from one another if they are seated near strangers.
My guess is that students want to respect the privacy and space of others
if possible.
The traffic in and out of the room corresponded to the class schedule at
UW. Several people left before 1:30 and several people arrived after
1:20 pm.
The sign-up for the consultant is done in an orderly fashion. One
student looked for the consultant, but she learned the protocol after the
consultant explained the sign-up procedure. This study took place
during the first Friday of spring quarter, so the student may have been
unfamiliar with the procedure.
Most students figured out that the person seated near the door was the
lab monitor. There were no signs indicating that this person was
the lab monitor.
When students conversed, the level of their voices was very low.
I could not tell if their conversations were about the homework or otherwise.
It did not seem that students were helping each other with homework assignments.
The CSE 143 consultant was busy most of the time during my observation.
The average length of each tutoring session was about 4 minutes.
Before I observed the IPL, I did not think I would get to observe too much
activity. During the observation, I was constantly taking notes on
the activities and observations.