Bergmann, R. and Wilke, W. (1995)
"Building and Refining Abstract Planning Cases by Change of Representation Language",
Volume 3, pages 53-118.
Abstract: Abstraction is one of the most promising approaches to improve the
performance of problem solvers. In several domains abstraction by
dropping sentences of a domain description -- as used in most
hierarchical planners -- has proven useful. In this paper we present
examples which illustrate significant drawbacks of abstraction by
dropping sentences. To overcome these drawbacks, we propose a more
general view of abstraction involving the change of representation
language. We have developed a new abstraction methodology and a
related sound and complete learning algorithm that allows the complete
change of representation language of planning cases from concrete to
abstract. However, to achieve a powerful change of the representation
language, the abstract language itself as well as rules which describe
admissible ways of abstracting states must be provided in the domain
model. This new abstraction approach is the core of Paris (Plan
Abstraction and Refinement in an Integrated System), a system in which
abstract planning cases are automatically learned from given concrete
cases. An empirical study in the domain of process planning in
mechanical engineering shows significant advantages of the proposed
reasoning from abstract cases over classical hierarchical planning.
Click here to return to the JAIR home page.